Folding, spindeling, and mutilating lauguage for fun since Aug, 2004
Saturday, September 29, 2007

I know I said I was done with Ron Paul, but this has been bugging me ever since I read it.

 

To solve the problem of frivolous lawsuits, which admittedly do happen, Ron Paul propses that we simply have people insure THEMSELVES against malpractice by their doctors.

 

That way, the doctors don't get sued and get to keep their money, the insurance companies get more business and more money, people harmed by doctors get compensated eventually after they sue the insurance company to get the money out of them after the insurance company denies the claim based on trumped-up excuses.  Everyone wins except the trial lawyers, who get a career set-back after they have to change specialties from suing doctors to suing claims-denying insurance companies.

 

Sure...except those who can't afford all the insurance premiums that are already required to just live in our society.  They get screwed some more.

 

Plus, how does this serve the much-vaunted Libertarian value of personal responsibility?  I have to pay money to insure myself so that someone else doesn't have to pay for their mistakes?

 

Pardon me, but that's F$%#!ed up.

 

You know what would help doctors out a lot?  Paying more attention to their patients, listening to them when they describe their symptoms, and not dismissing their concerns about specific health problems out of arrogance.  Also, hospitals could help by better managing their staff and not exhausting them with Bataan death-march shifts that lead to fatigue errors.

 

One of the things I've noticed is an increased reliance on Hospitalists.  Would hospitals and doctors be motivated to innovate improvements in patient care if accidents and mistakes just became the patient's problem?  Having a doctor around who is familiar with all aspects of a patient's care (where patients might have more than one or two conditions that need to be considered in care), as well as making sure that hospital procedures and policies are followed will go a long way to preventing medical malpractice and the suits that go with them.  Who knows what other improvements hospitals and doctors can make to help them provide more consistantly better care?

 

When I think about all the stuff that we've gone through in our lives due to negligence and summary judgements of medical professionals not paying attention to their patients, being dismissive and arrogant, not following hospital procedures, etc, it makes me just MAD that someone would suggest that we should have to pay out of our own pockets to protect other people and institutions from their own mistakes.

 

Saturday, September 29, 2007 6:24:32 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) | Comments [7] | #
Saturday, September 29, 2007 10:51:00 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
I was listening to a piece on public radio, where they said that doctors are forced by the insurance companies to see X number of patients a day and simply aren't allowed to spend the necessary time with patients to establish rapport and really listen to their problems and draw out otherwise unreported symptoms.

Tell me again why it is that corporate bureaucrats are allowed to tell professionals how they need to be practicing their profession?
Saturday, September 29, 2007 6:56:48 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
And the doctors take the blame for the mistakes, and the patients take the blame for the rising cost of liability insurance.

Of course, the governing boards of some states do very little to discipline bad doctors either.

Some of the oversight by Insurance companies is because of the intense use of kick-backs to doctors if they use enough of certain medicines. Insurance companies push back to lower costs. There's a lot of reasons, but that's one that comes to mind.

Maybe they would lower costs if they gave doctors enough time to figure out what the hell is wrong with a person the first time they see them.

Rocky's gall bladder problem was waved off as "the flu" by an ER doctor, and it delayed treatment for nearly a week. Rocky was a lot sicker, and required much more medical care than he would have had the diagnosis been appropriate the first time. Also, The thyorid problem I had that the doctor refused to diagnose impacted my health much more than it should have, and could very well have killed me, as I was very sick by the time I got to the the nurse practitioner who finally ran the test and diagnosed it. If depression and fatigue and such were not part of the disease, I would have stood up to the bully of a doctor, but I couldn't at that time.

So if we want to control health costs (does anyone think we could pull off lowering health costs?), seems to me that part of the deal would be making sure the system works correctly. This might not seem very "efficient" at first, but in the end, it's penny-wise and pound foolish to do otherwise.

My facvorite perscription for health care reform that people can do at home: Preventive care,(healthy living, eat right, exercise), insist on genarics whenever possible, and be in charge of your medical care. (stay informed, ask questions, make the doctor explain everything to you until you understand it, get second opinions before embarking on treatment).

I would also add, check up on your doctor and make sure they have a good reputation. I also use a nurse practitioner for my general medical needs. I don't need an Ear Nose and Throat specialist to diagnose a sinus infection. My nurse practitioner knows that I pretty much know what's going on with my body, and listens to me. It works great. I see an allergy/athsma specialist, though.

Somehow, I think these things will do more good than simply buying another kind of insurance and sending off regular payments for another company to jerk me around when I need them to come through on the services I paid for.
Teresa
Monday, October 01, 2007 10:22:07 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Oh Ron! Ron, Ron, Ron...

What are you doing??? Unbelievable. I back you to the point of even trying to defend some of your religious statements, only to get rightfully blasted in the process. I tell people that you are "the man" when it comes to voting and pushing for constitutional laws. And what do I receive in return?

Oh the pain - the agony! Don't you know that insurance companies are the biggest part of the problem with health care?!? Now you want more?!?

I think I'm gonna be sick... Oh, wait! I can't afford to be sick.

[groan] [sigh] [mumble]...
Mark
Monday, October 01, 2007 11:34:49 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Wow. There's someone out there who's vastly more friendly to the insurance companies than Hillary Clinton?

Hey, Mark - you may have a better candidate to support!

<ducks and runs>
Monday, October 01, 2007 12:06:19 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Hillary Clinton !?!?

Just the sound of her voice puts me on edge. Kinda like running fingernails on a chalk board - only a thousand times worse.

Run fast Rick! And don't come back! ;)

We have our facial recognition system in place! We know what you look like. Our newest robo-cop will arest you on sight if you come back.
Mark
Monday, October 01, 2007 12:32:49 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
I think we can all agree that the fine pickin's are mighty slim (or non-existant).

So far as I can tell, I'm just going to have to hold my nose while I vote and shower thoroughly afterwards.

At least I'm rock solid on the ticket I'm going to vote for the school board. Sigh.
Teresa
Tuesday, October 02, 2007 6:08:40 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
In these volatile times it is the duty of every true blue American to let their voice be heard. I recomend doing so by taking place in the poll below. You'll be participating in the process and have a nice little cathartic moment all in one go.
Cheers!
Bob

http://www.joecartoon.com/cartoons/649-blender_poll_trailer
Bob Wagner
Comments are closed.
Search
Archive
Links
Categories
Admin Login
Sign In
Blogroll
Themes
Pick a theme: