Folding, spindeling, and mutilating lauguage for fun since Aug, 2004
Sunday, October 26, 2008

I’ve read more than one conservative commentator who points out that McCain surrounds himself in his campaign with many more accomplished and capable women, and thus is better on wage parity and opportunity for women than Obama.

However, given McCain’s history with women, it looks to me more like a case of Lazarus Long syndrome rather than being a beacon of equality and opportunity.

Not that there’s anything wrong with a guy wanting to be surrounded by accomplished women who are dedicated to his success and vision, I just suspect that it is more for the benefit of McCain than for the benefit of the campaign or the women, and it should not be assumed that McCain’s public policies will follow from any sort of feminist thought or dedication to a feminist outlook…liberal or conservative.

Sunday, October 26, 2008 9:21:32 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) | Comments [2] | #
Sunday, October 26, 2008 10:55:50 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
I would say the commentary I've run into has taken the opposite side of the issue: what does it say about Obama's campaign that there aren't more women in powerful positions in it? Much of this commentary comes from Hillary Clinton supporters who argue that a thread of misogyny has been part of the Obama campaign from Day One. But combining this with the commentary you've been reading leaves me thinking that the Obama campaign missed a small but meaningful opportunity here.
Elizabeth
Sunday, October 26, 2008 1:23:07 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Elizabeth,

I noticed that the Palin supporters tend to take their criticisms of Obama from the Hillary camp. ;-)

Teresa
Comments are closed.
Search
Archive
Links
Categories
Admin Login
Sign In
Blogroll
Themes
Pick a theme: