Folding, spindeling, and mutilating lauguage for fun since Aug, 2004
Saturday, July 28, 2007

I'm involved in a discussion group about a book called "Jim and Casper Go to Church" - written by Jim Henderson, a pastor/housepainter and Matt Casper, an atheist hired by Jim to accompany him to various Christian churches.

Disclaimer: Our discussion group is not unbiased- it is held in a United Methodist church, and most attendees are members. However- it has proven so far (on week 4) to at least be a healthy discussion, and not a debate. I'm honestly not a real fan of debate- or the whole "I'm right, you're wrong, and I could prove it if only you weren't so narrow-minded."

The opinions expressed in our class range from socially moderate to socially liberal, but don't cover extremes. As a rule, legalistic Christians view our church as anything from slightly misguided (not enough focus on sin) to blasphemous (preaching the untruth) and therefore steer clear. OTOH- I would say our church doesn't really appeal to the unchurched, atheists, or extremist liberals because it is difficult for some to believe the motto posted on our door "Open Hearts, Open Doors, and Open Minds", could apply to any Christian, no matter how well-meaning they may be.

Jim the Christian, recruited Casper the Atheist from an Off the Map blog contest to find an atheist willing to attend churches and speak openly about his experiences (The site is:
http://www.off-the-map.org/atheist/. Don't look for the same commitment to open-mindedness here-the threads too often are  dominated by people with an agenda-though they are generally polite about it.)

ANYHOO- these two guys, who become good friends, travel all over the country to visit many different types and sizes of churches, and this book documents the experience. In our group of about 20, questions based on the book are posed to us and we are invited to share our perspectives.

Some of Casper's observations demand a response. In one example, at Willow Creek- a mega-church outside Chicago, Casper is astounded to hear the preacher thank people for their prayers to help him land an interview with Bono. Casper says, "People are being killed needlessly in every corner of the world, kids are starving, and people are praying for their pastor to meet a rock star? That's ludicrous."

This does not resemble our church prayer experience- in fact Pastor Bill once got a complaint that his prayers for peace, and to help us to do as Jesus taught- to feed the poor, visit the sick and imprisoned, have compassion for the mentally ill, and to love our neighbors, etc. were too depressing. Yet I think it helps us to understand the perspective of non-Christians who think that at best we are largely failing in our call to help those in need, and at worst, whipping up a frenzy against "sinners" (which means everyone NOT like them), praying for personal wealth while we ignore the cries of the poor (clearly they are poor because they are "sinners") and praying for our pastors to win famous friends and influence people.  When you look at sheer numbers, Willow Creek has 20,0000 attendees each week, so its influence can't be ignored. It is obvious that these megachurches are as good at marketing as the more legalistic churches are at lobbying for political influence (If that point isn't obvious, just search "those wacky fundies" on Teresa's blog, and grab a coffee- cuz' you'll be reading a while.)

A large chunk of the questions from Casper in this book ask "If Jesus did X, why aren't you focused on X?", based on his experience visiting these churches. It is fair to say that this was his take-away more often than not.

There were also a couple of times Casper felt genuinely moved (not moved in the God-sense, but in a way he describes as "the humans' need for expression taking over"), and a couple instances where he was blown away by the positive impact a church had individuals or their community- hard-core criminals who authentically turned their lives around, and one church in an impoverished area that began their mission by providing a washer and dryer for the homeless to use so they could wash their clothes before appearing for a job interview, and now provides a free health clinic, free daycare, and builds no-profit homes for low-income people in abandoned neighborhoods.

Out of curiosity, I looked up some numbers. According to the Association of Religous Data Archives:
http://www.thearda.com/mapsReports/reports/US_2000.asp  US mainline protestants +26,150,866, Catholics 62,035,042, Orthodox 989,106, Evangelical Protestant 39,935,307, Other religions 12,254,099 and Unclaimed 140,057,419 (which includes atheists as well as all others who were not adherents of any of the 188 groups included). Interesting. There are 3x as many Unclaimed as there are Evangelicals.

Our church is lumped in with the Mainline Protestants. Seeing the number 26,150,866 leads me to believe that if we strived to improve on practicing what we preach- that is a LOT of potential to help the poor, sick, and oppressed. Considering many of my friends fall in the Unclaimed group, and I know they too desire to help the poor, sick, and the oppressed- it helps me see how important it is to find common ground and pool our resources, and for Christians to, as Jim puts it "NOT be jerks to non-Christians."  In order to do this, we have to be willing to really get to know people beyond their soundbite "I'm an atheist" or "I'm a Christian" or "I'm a Wiccan", or whatever.

I guess that's the point of attempting to have an open dialogue versus a Convince-Fest.

Pastor Bill is gone this week, and I volunteered to lead the discussion on Wednesday night- and no one objected loudly enough to stop me, so if any of you have your own thoughts or perceptions you'd like to share, I'm interested to read them, and to share them with our group. Thank you to all who are willing to share, let others be heard, and not attempt to dominate the discussion or convince anyone of your stance.

Trees' friend Sue.



Saturday, July 28, 2007 11:05:32 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) | Comments [5] |  | #
Saturday, July 28, 2007 11:15:13 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
I object to being called "unclaimed", though. It brings up the image of a lonely, battered suitcase circleing round and round endlessly and pointlessly...

...a sensation that I associate much more strongly with my attempts to participate in religion.

:-)
Teresa
Monday, July 30, 2007 12:02:04 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Couple of things here Sue,

First, Willow Creek manages 20,000 *per service*. Depending on the numbers you believe they a have around 70,000-120,000 parishioners each week because they have multiple services. Think of that in terms of tying up God's call center for a second.

Second. As far as preaching to help the poor and needy (and believe me I support that), you might be careful what you wish for. I suspect that is one of the ideas behind the infamous "Faith Based Initiatives". Move help for the under-privileged from the public into the preaching sector. You point out the problem. What happens if the parishioners stop supporting that kind of help. What then?

On the other hand, the unclaimed faithful looks to be more of a (historically– not theologically based) lack of centralized structures in American religions. If you look somewhere like Germany, because “official” churches receive a tithe officially skimmed from paychecks each month (if you choose to belong to a church). That makes a huge hurdle to overcome between the unclaimed and the ‘real’ churches. It is also one of the reasons for the fights about things like Scientology or Jehovah’s Witnesses who never made the “official” church status: Scientology managed to go one further and got to the list of “Un-Constitutional” groups. They are officially a cult.

Finally. Have you read “I sold my soul on eBay” by Hemant Mehta, the Friendly Athiest (http://friendlyatheist.com/)? Both his blog and his book make excellent reading. (nudge, nudge, wink, wink)

Trees,
You’re not so much unclaimed as uncontrollable, (think five year old taking a mastiff for a walk in a park full of baby ducks. You are the mastiff.).
Monday, July 30, 2007 1:16:38 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Mea Culpa.

The Jehovah’s Witnesses did get offical status in 2005 (http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,1564,1530197,00.html). Missed that somehow.
Monday, July 30, 2007 5:53:20 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Ben,

grrrr...woof!

But I think Sue was looking at church effort as a supplement to public efforts at social justice, rather than a replacement. But this is the problem with the "dialogue" the right-wing-fundie-types have comingled the idea of social justice and private charity in such a way that if you talk about the issue you are seen as taking up one at the expense of another. If you promote social justice as a public concern, then you must obviously be against private charity. If you promote private charity, you must be one of those who view social justice as theft.

In my view, like religion and science, they are two different things with two different purposes, and trying to make one do the work of the other is inherantly flawed. Government social justice programs are meant to correct inherant injustices and flaws in the system that make it impossible for some people to function as they should. Charity is at it's best when it is used to mitigate personal misfortune that is of a temporary nature.

Look at what happened with "disaster fatugue". There came a point in the last couple of years when most people simply couldn't bring themselves to care about victims of tragedy enough to pull out their wallets. Many of those who DID contribute to helping did so at the expense of organiations they normally contributed to.

The instability of charitable giving leads to money only being available for emotionally stirring, fashionable, or politically useful causes. When the tide turns, organizations are left high and dry. This instability leads to a need for endless fund-raiseing, drum-beating, and advertizing...which cost a lot of money.

People who whine and moan about the "inefficiency" of government programs should take a look at some of these private charities instead...where less than 10% are actually used to help people and 90% is administrative costs. From what I can see, secular NGOs tend to have the best efficiency, but they also have the problem of having to deal with uneven and capricious funding.

And now they have to deal with an increasingly hostile administration, trying to put them out of business, requireing tha they muzzle their messages and activities that are perhaps offensive to religion, but actually are effective at helping people (For instance, promoting condom use amongst prostitutes, clean needles for drug addicts, etc. apparently Jesus was against harm prevention and risk reduction. No sense reducing the risks you can while trying to change people's behaviors, I guess.)
Teresa
Saturday, August 25, 2007 12:54:00 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Hi, Teresa & Sue! I'm glad that you are enjoying "Jim & Casper Go to Church." I'm a volunteer with Jim's organization Off the Map and I wanted to let you know about our Live event coming up this November in Seattle. Both Jim and Matt Casper will be speaking at this event. Here is the link if you want to find out more: http://www.offthemap.com/live
Comments are closed.
Search
Archive
Links
Categories
Admin Login
Sign In
Blogroll
Themes
Pick a theme: