"Real meaning of life...stuff" - Daniel Jackson
Thursday, November 30, 2006

Take a look at this video.    (I got the link from EclecticsAnonymous.)  It is put together by Amnesty International, the ACLU, and The National Council of the Church of Christ in the USA.  It features interviews with some of the people that our country has nabbed, disappeared, and handed over to other countries for torture in the “War on Terror”.  Also note that this program was operating long before the Patriot Act, and before George "W" Bush was our president.  The guy who is identified as the "Chief Archetect of the Extraordinary Rendition program" talks about what they were doing in 1995.

 

Then contemplate these quotes from Thomas Pain:

 

Man did not enter into society to become worse than he was before, nor to have fewer rights than he had before, but to have those rights better secured. His natural rights are the foundation of all his civil rights. (The Rights of Man)

 

Immediate necessity makes many things convenient, which if continued would grow into oppressions. Expedience and right are different things. ( Common Sense)

 

As well as this from Thomas Jefferson:

“Freedom of the person under the protection of the habeas corpus I deem [to be one of the] essential principles of our government." (1st Inaugural Address)

So I wonder, how are we better off if our government can simply take us from our homes, our families, hold us without charges for months on end, remand us to the custody of other countries to be tortured, and allow no possible recourse?

 

Is this superior to living in a situation with no government, where people can be kidnapped and brutalized by thugs off the street?

 

Isn’t it a greater insult for our government to do this, when we give them the power and money and other means to do it?

 

I’ve talked to a few people who have said “I don’t want to know about it because there’s nothing I can do about it.”

 

While it’s true that there is very little you can do about it…KNOWING about it is probably the most important thing you CAN do.  Having people know about it HURTS the people who are doing it.  The more people who know about it, the harder it is for them to work without accountability.

 

But beyond that, if you are a citizen of this country, you have a duty to know what is being done in your name, with your tax money and the power you invest in your government.

Thursday, November 30, 2006 1:46:24 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) | Comments [2] | #
Thursday, November 30, 2006 4:00:09 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
I know that it's an uncomfortable comparison to make, but many Germans during and following WWII insisted that they did nothing, because there was nothing they could do about the Nazi brutality. Just a thought.
Thursday, November 30, 2006 11:19:58 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
First, a minor correction. The three organisations mentioned are only three of the fourteen international Human Rights organizations who worked on the film. I didn't feel the need to list all of them. (I am not MSM. :-)

And Karen, I would agree with both sentiments. The comparison is uncomfortable and appropriate. Studying the paths societies take to drift into totalitarian systems is something I have been actively pursuing in recent months. Your comparison or perhaps better dark prophecy breaks down at the basic level of how citizens look the country and its institutions. Pre-Nazi Germany in the 1920’s and 1930’s was a country without a direction, neither politically nor morally. After the end of the First World War, the collapse of the monarchy and the (partially perceived) persecution by the Versailles Treaty, there was no central principle all Germans could support. The Communists increasingly drawn into Moscow’s sphere, the Social Democrats weakened by inflation and unemployment and the center/right both looking back to a more authoritarian and traditional monarchist approach. This allowed the Nazis the niche they so artfully exploited.

But going back to Teresa’s point that KNOWING is the strongest weapon in the arsenal of the citizenry. I would subscribe to that opinion.

Indeed it was plane watchers who exposed the CIA movements of prisoners. (Plane watchers are those people who spend hours and days at airports just taking pictures of airplanes and writing down the tail numbers – a strange fetish.) That in combination with the internet allowed Human Rights organisations (and perhaps just a hint of investigative reporting by Dana Priest, one of my journalistic heroines) to piece together a coherent picture pf illicit flights carrying prisoners across the globe. This information greatly aided EU investigations into the issue and basically showed them where to start. It also exposed the entire mess.

I am starting to see the fabric of hyperbole, lies and deception created by the current Bush administration become frayed at the edges and unweave. While the technology necessary to create a completely monitored society is slowly emerging, techniques that would have been a Nazi’s wet dream, I feel the ability to centrally control countries and cultures is diminishing because the world is intellectually shrinking and cultural barriers are starting to fall.

Not only is the knowledge of what the government does important - but the understanding of other peoples and other cultures is critical to keeping a safe and sane world. It is the belief that all humans are equal, regardless of what race, religion or culture they belong to, that is the real hope for mankind.
Comments are closed.
Search
Archive
Links
Categories
Admin Login
Sign In
Blogroll
Themes
Pick a theme: