Folding, spindeling, and mutilating lauguage for fun since Aug, 2004
Monday, 01 June 2009

You gotta go over to 4simpsons real quick and scan down the front page looking for Neil's "multiverse" post, or google it if it has already rolled off.  I don't want to trigger his paranoia with too many links but this is amazing!

Neil actually thinks that the multi-verse theories were proposed to counter Intelligent Design Theory.

Um.  The Multiverse Theory pre-dates the Intelligent Design political movement.

The Multiverse theory is described by mathematics.  The Intelligent Design political movement cannot be described according to any coherent organizational model.

But theoretical Physicists are just scrambling to scratch up something to answer Intelligent Design with.

Uh huh.  Whatever helps you sleep at night, Neil baby.

But I'd like to point out that the only way that the Multi-verse theories could have been created to respond to Intelligent Design is if the scientists developed them after 1992 (When ID was created) and then went back in time a significant amount, and then introduced a progressive series of theoretical models beginning with when the term was coined in the late 1800.

Of course, the only way that time travel would be even remotely possible is if one of the multiple universe theories were true... (since going back in time and changing events would create another alternate universe, and an alternate time-line).

And furthermore, why are we to believe that scientists are desperately flailing around to discount the arguments of ID proponents when ID proponents seem to have to be always making statements like this?:

 

[Update]  about not provoking his paranoia:  Too late. Neil is already Jonseing on how persecuted he is that people disagree with him and find his lunacy entertaining.  He only listed three people this time.  Usually he goes on much longer about how important an Godly he must be because people disagree with him.

Monday, 01 June 2009 18:53:06 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) | Comments [19] |  |  |  |  |  |  | #
Tuesday, 02 June 2009 06:33:54 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
I love when people who think the world was created 6000 years ago decide to try their hand at critiquing real science.

Maybe in one of their multiverses, the 6000 year old sun revolves around the 6000 year old Earth where dinosaurs and Fred Flintstone live in harmony.
Tuesday, 02 June 2009 08:44:20 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
OK, you made me go over there, dammit.

LOL. You know, I haven't commented on his blog in several *years*, since he banned me, which I never said was because I'm gay (though I have no doubt that played a role ... not a big surprise given his bigotry.) I'm sure I was banned because I dared to challenge him. And who the hell cares? What is this, middle school? I moved on, I think it's odd that he can't.

I haven't responded to any comments he makes on other blogs I read, I don't go to other blogs to engage him. I try, as everyone pretty much knows, to have as little to do with him and the rest of the Amerikkkan Descent crowd as possible. I don't comment, I don't engage, I ignore. In other words, I have had absolutely nothing to say to him in years and he still goes on and on about some onanistic fantasy/fetish he has about me and camping.

Dude seriously needs some help before he pulls a Haggard.

And then he writes a page-long rambling post about how he doesn't have time for us terrible people, the 20th such post he's written? Seriously he needs to stop with the obsession.

As for his "They disagree with me so I must be right!" reasoning, it's classic cult reasoning. David Koresh, Jim Jones, you name it, you can find exactly the same idea in their speeches and writing.
Tuesday, 02 June 2009 09:31:01 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Alan,

I know, his descfiptions of your ficticious camping post has gotten steamier and steamier everytime he tells it!
Teresa
Tuesday, 02 June 2009 09:45:32 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Oh, the camping post is real, it's just that nothing in the post itself real, it's obviously exaggeration for humorous effect. Like almost everything on my blog, it's a writing exercise that has little correspondence to real life.

It just occurred to me that he may actually be so stupid that he thinks people never embellish their blog-stories to make them more funny. If we didn't, we'd all end up with the most boring blogs on the planet ... um ... like his, I guess. Ok, we can call that hypothesis confirmed, I guess.

But clearly that's a notion that's lost on him, probably because realizing that would deprive him of his sweaty, furtive late-night visits to my blog (which, though he may deny he stops by, my site stats seem to show otherwise.)

I've read about creepy internet crushes like this. I'm going to need to get a restraining order at some point, aren't I?
Tuesday, 02 June 2009 09:49:58 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Alan, Neil loooooves you! Just like Jesus (tm)! It's only your sin that he hates, Hates, HATES! in accordance with Sound Doctrine (tm) chapter 3, sub-section 8a, paragraph 9, 2008 Edition.

And remember, Neil was caught lying his ass off here on these pages and when called on it basically just flounced out saying that we weren't worth his time anymore. Odd how that's a recurring theme....
Tuesday, 02 June 2009 09:58:10 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Critical reading is not his strong suit. He routinely misses the markers for sarcasm and parody, just for starters.
Teresa
Tuesday, 02 June 2009 10:14:29 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Yes, he does seem to spend lots of time talking about how he hates wasting his time on things that waste his time, which he talks about all the time. ;)

Oh well, I guess I'll try to just feel flattered. Though it would be easier to be flattered if my internet stalker crush was from someone who is at least mildly attractive instead of a prissy, bigoted, closeted fusspot and busybody. I've never had a hankerin' for the Gladys Kravitz types ... I'm more into men, I guess. :)
Tuesday, 02 June 2009 11:08:06 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Alan, but how can you say that about him when you've seen him in those fabulous pantaloons!?! It takes a real man to wear pantaloons in a ballet and post ictures on the internet and then talk about the homosexual lifestyle with a straight face.
Teresa
Tuesday, 02 June 2009 12:15:39 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Oddly enough the pantaloons actually made him look a little more butch.

Which just goes to show, I guess. LOL
Tuesday, 02 June 2009 14:43:04 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
"I know, his descfiptions of your ficticious camping post has gotten steamier and steamier everytime he tells it!"

Sounds like there's some slashfic in there...?
Tuesday, 02 June 2009 14:55:05 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Thanks God I don't have that much time on my hands...
Teresa
Tuesday, 02 June 2009 15:05:46 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
:-D
Tuesday, 02 June 2009 15:34:21 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
"Sounds like there's some slashfic in there...?"

Written by HWMNBN? I think I just puked a little in my mouth.
Tuesday, 02 June 2009 15:49:56 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Alan,

Rick wrote some and sent it to me privately...want to read it? ;-)
Teresa
Tuesday, 02 June 2009 17:25:29 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
I'd rather spend an eternity eating shards of broken glass. I'd rather jump naked into a pool of double-edged razor blades. I'd rather clean all the toilets in Grand Central Station with my tongue. I'd rather have my blood sucked out by leeches, shove an ice pick under a toe-nail or two. I'd rather rip out my intestines with a fork. (h/t Weird Al)
Tuesday, 02 June 2009 20:27:55 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
LOL! I recognized them Wwird Al lyrics! You score major nerd cred, my man!
Teresa
Tuesday, 02 June 2009 20:28:47 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Rick's story is...extremely well written which makes it all the more terrible to behld.
Teresa
Wednesday, 03 June 2009 12:07:44 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
"Well-written"??? You flatter me; I was deliberately going for the "truck-stop-paperback-bodice-ripper" style, which is anything but good writing. Though I think I did manage a fair dose of ironic humor.

Alan, it's short; maybe a page-and-a-half. Read it for the lulz. It's all about the lulz.
Wednesday, 03 June 2009 16:03:21 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Rick,

That's what I mean...you NAILED it!
Teresa
Comments are closed.
Search
Archive
Links
Categories
Admin Login
Sign In
Blogroll
Themes
Pick a theme: