"Real meaning of life...stuff" - Daniel Jackson
Sunday, January 30, 2005

Like many compellingly outrageous topics on education I’ve had brought to my attention, this one was found at Ernie’s 3-D Pancakes. 

Here is an article on the subject…and another.

 

The thrust of the story is, this 17-year-old kid wanted to get into an honors math course at his high school, and as a condition of admission into this class he has to complete three very difficult calculus problems over the course of the summer.  It must be stressed that this was a voluntary assignment…insofar as the student could have opted to stay in the regular course of mathematics, and not do the problems.

 

Basically, he wanted to be special, and smart, and recognized for his pursuit of excellence, and have exceptional opportunities opened up for him without actually doing anything extra to deserve it.

 

And now, he’s suing his teacher for “ruining his summer.”  So…well…not being terribly comfortable with being judgmental of other people, I nonetheless say …WTF?

 

I understand that he didn’t want to spend the summer doing calculus.  Trigonometry alone gave me panic attacks.  This is where a choice comes in.  You get to make choices, and then you act on them…or not.  I might allow that there would be some argument against the teacher requiring the students to attend classes or meetings over the summer…or any other egregiously burdensome requirement…as children rarely are in control of such things, and family concerns take precedent over the summer.  But three problems, which they could pace themselves on doesn’t seem to be an egregious burden…any more than asking a kid who wants to go out for Band or Orchestra to prepare an audition piece on their own time, or requiring football players to stick to a training regimen over the summer.  God forbid that we ever have lower standards for special academic programs than we do for sports programs.

 

Further, the father’s defense of the lawsuit is so schizophrenic as to be laughable.  He asked the school district to show him the law that allowed them to assign work over the summer.   They could not.  So, he concludes that this is not a frivolous lawsuit.

 

If this flies, I’m going to tell my kids to go into law and specialize in school-related litigation.  I’ll have that retirement villa in the south of Spain yet…just imagine the possibilities for suing the school systems for doing things that they don’t have a specific guarantee under the law of being allowed to do.  Where’s the law that says they get to hold kids to scheduled bathroom breaks?  Where’s the law that says there can be a spelling test on weeks with only four school days in them?  Where’s the law that says they can prohibit a child from having more than one friend ride home with them on the bus?

 

So, having established that I think this lawsuit is misplaced and the argument of the plaintiffs is flawed…let me do the liberal thing and say where I think this might be coming from…and propose that we look at the underlying causes and see what we can do about them.

 

I talk to a lot of people, and I read a lot of opinion pieces, and from the whiney side of things I get a lot of “The school is taking over our free time”, “there’s too much homework”, “We don’t have time to be a family”, and my personal favorite:  “Kids need time to just be kids”.

 

And I’ve noticed in my own life, that the school district has relied more and more on parents and the kids to be responsible for their education.  When I was a kid, I had very little homework, and most of it got done in school.  When a teacher told me to write a paper, they gave me a packet that told me how to do it, and we went over the essay form until it was lasered indelibly into my brain.  I pretty much got the hand-holding treatment from teachers, and rarely had to ask my parents to help me with anything.  We didn’t have to do reading minutes, or flashcards, or get assigned educational games or required family field trips outside of school.  My parents would never have THOUGHT about paying for someplace like Sylvan.

 

Now days, parents pretty much have to spend their evenings and weekends picking up the slack for increasingly strapped school districts.  For instance, our school district is cutting hours from the school day to save money.  Who is going to make up that time?  Parents who care about their children’s education, of course.  Our school district has also placed a moratorium on class field trips, so we have already been assigned one family field trip this year.  I spend an hour every day doing basic skills work with Bunny Boy, plus homework time…and record our time and accomplishments in a ledger that goes back to school.  Adventure Boy has reached an age where he is able to do much of his extra work on his own and keep his own ledger, so that has gotten easier.

 

But I think that this lawsuit, and the strong public support of this child from fellow students and parents is less about three calculus problems, and more a reaction to the growing trend of schools pushing more and more responsibility for a child’s education onto the children themselves, and by extension, onto their parents…and children who want an exceptional education have to go to even more exceptional lengths to get it.  I just bet that this is the first family in this district to reach their “enough point”.

 

But then, this is what you get when you demand “fiscal responsibility” from your schools, combined with a demand that they somehow achieve greater and greater results on less and less money.…they eliminate “excess functions” like holding your child’s hand and spoon-feeding them information.  They cut the number of students who can be served by special advanced programs (the most expensive ones, and the ones that get the least amount of federal funding), and by extension increase the competition for admission into those programs.  They demand more effort and personal accountability from you and your child if you want to get into those programs.

 

It could be that the previous generation grew up with unrealistic expectations of how schools were going to teach their children everything they needed to know without the parents having to do anything.  I know I was surprised (and generally delighted) at how active I was expected to be…and I have seen the expectations grow every year with a shrinking budget and the demands of greater performance.  And yes, the pressure has increased, and the stress on our whole family.  Sometimes I resent it when it feels like all we do is school-related stuff, and it still isn’t enough…but ultimately, it’s just the result of our values as a society, and we can accept it and move on…doing what we have to do to get by in the system as it is, or we can try to change it…

 

…but crying about it and suing the school district isn’t going to help the underlying issues.  In fact, it makes at least one of the worse, by costing the district money to defend themselves from lawsuits, and paying any sort of settlement that might (God forbid) be ordered.

Sunday, January 30, 2005 3:17:22 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) | Comments [5] |  |  | #
Monday, January 31, 2005 6:43:32 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
That is absolutely absurd. I can see something like this happening about a kid who's what, ten? But, seventeen? I understand that I have to work for school, other kids understand that they have to read their summer reading, or they won't pass their classes. If he wants to be in an advanced class, he's going to have to work for it. If he doesn't want his 'Summer ruined' than he can stay with the rest of the kids in Algebra II or Trig or whatever he feels like doing. If he likes math, than he shouldn't have a problem with that--if he doesn't, he shouldn't be in the class.

Things like this make me angry, because I work my butt off for school. I'm in an AP class, and it's practically eaten my soul. I'll get over that, though, right now I have time to think about Louis XIV, and then later I'll have time to think about other things. You only have one chance to be taught things for free--so you should give back and work for it. We have an excellent program here at EP, so maybe it's different for us, because we expect work. But, if you're going to sue for the pre-requasite test.. that's like suing the ACT for freaking you out. Abosolutely unexceptable.

Sometimes I can't stand the amount of homework I have, and sometimes I whine and snark about it, but whatever. I'll live. I think by high school, though, the parent involvement and parent help reduces itself to "here, sign this", because they do kind of hand-hold you. I don't really know the difference between the Elementaries, though, because in Nashville they definately didn't do much parent involvement.

Anyway, that kid needs to grow up.
Monday, January 31, 2005 6:48:29 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
To steal a line from Fark.com, "Once again, personal responsibility rolls over in its grave".
Kaji
Monday, January 31, 2005 10:17:57 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Point one: I once again am nauseated by the sense of entitlement and lack of personal responsability. I am reminded of what Ayn rand had to say about people who say things that start with "I want" or even worse "I need".

Point two: If I were runnign the class, I'd now add a second requierment. First, solve three math problems. Second, don't sue the school if you can't do the math.
The Evil Cub
Monday, January 31, 2005 1:55:53 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Cub,

I don't think Ayn Rand had a problem with "I want" or "I need" so much as "I want" or "I need" followed by "so therefore you have to..."

Oddly enough, it wasn't that he couldn't do the math...he did the problems...it's just that it stressed him out and ruined his fun...which is worse than not being able to do the math. I mean, it would be another thing entierly if the requirements had been unattainable...but they weren't...obviously. He and presumably a classroom full of other students managed to solve all three problems.

He met the requirements to get into the class...and he got in...and he's still bitching...because it was hard and stressful...

...which to my mind makes it even more silly.

I've done plenty of things in my life that were hard and stressful, and a couple that nearly broke me...and I find it mystifying that someone would go through something like that and complain about it rather than celebrate their triumph...rather than be the conquering hero, they would act like a loser and whine about it being hard.

It's a whole different mindset. Some people take their lumps and move on, some wear their scars like badges, and some use them as an excuse to whine and cry and get pity...the first two I understand and respect...the last one...not so much.
kemaris
Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:06:12 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Ah, I must have missed where he actually got into the class. I had assumed he was bitching because the problems 'stressed' him out, and he didn't do them, but felt entitled to be in the class anyway.

What we have here instead is a case of 'Republican Winner's Syndrome'. t isn't enough to simply be victorious (and controll all aspects of the government). You must still assume the position of 'victim' even while enjoying the fruits of victory. It sounds like this kid is well on his way to earning a good position in the regressivist political movement. All that's left is for him to say that the reason he's beuing victimized is because he is a Christian.
The Evil Cub
Comments are closed.
Search
Archive
Links
Categories
Admin Login
Sign In
Blogroll
Themes
Pick a theme: