"Real meaning of life...stuff" - Daniel Jackson
Tuesday, November 23, 2004

     So here’s a little something to think about.

     Several years ago, I was part of an online community on usenet.  RASTB5 was/is a fan discussion forum for Babylon Five fans.  It was also, like many usenet newsgroups at the time, prone to “flame wars”.  In particular, there was a guy that called J. Michael Straczynski (A.K.A, JMS) a bunch of names and said a lot of mean things about him personally.  I forget the exact words, but I seem to recall something about him being a “homo”.

     A bunch of people leapt to JMS’s defense and this person responded that if JMS couldn’t take criticism, he shouldn’t be a writer.

     Anyway, I was a mother of small children at the time.  I had a four-year-old and an infant.  I was working about 35 (at home, with the kids) hours a week, testing software.  I had a (then) undiagnosed case of hypothyroidism which caused my already massively sleep-deprived state to be amplified to nearly intolerable levels.

     But even in that state, I could tell the difference between criticism and personal attacks.  So in between work and housework and juggling two kids, through half-lidded, sleep-deprived eyes, I dashed off a response outlining the difference between the two.

     The next day, I found my mailbox full of angry, snide, obnoxious e-mails letting me know that I was a pretentious idiot who couldn’t spell and I should at least run a spell-check if I was going to tell people I had an English major.  (Just so you know, it was a HUGE affront to the denizens of that ‘verse to reference credentials.  They were quite hostile to anything that smacked of elitism.)

     Years later, a friend of mine did a Dogpile search on my name, and informed me that there was a website out there that was still mocking me for this post.

     I followed the URL, and sure enough…there was my post…with many of the logical and context-establishing bits edited out (as well as the repugnant crap that it was a response to), the misspelled words typed out below, and the quip “hope you kept the receipt on that degree.”

      It’s still out there.

     From this I learned:

 

  1. People are really vindictive.
  2. You should always run a spell-checker twice…even if you think you ran it…run it again.
  3. No matter how brilliant and flawless something seems, never send it off if you feel like you’ve been dragged fifty miles behind a truck by your eyelids.
  4. People who cannot argue with your reasoning resort to spelling/grammar nits.
  5. Putting anything on the internet should be like getting a tattoo…make sure that you are going to be able to tolerate looking at it 50 years from now…or at least resign yourself to the fact that you might hate it and still have to look at it.
  6. While you’re at it, accept that anything that you put out there can be taken, chopped, sliced, diced, twisted and made even uglier by petty, malicious people.
  7. People who loudly, vocally and publicly brag about not being members of “the intellectual elite” are probably not worth arguing with.

 

Useful information.  Thought I’d pass it along…absorb it, use it, profit from it.

 

Oh yeah, and one more only slightly related thing…don’t put anything up that could come back to haunt you in a court of law.

Tuesday, November 23, 2004 9:56:48 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) | Comments [3] | #
Wednesday, November 24, 2004 8:34:52 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Spell check is my personal savior, (sorry JC). I once scored a 48 on a 100 word spelling test yet managed to set a 15 year high on the PSAT at the same school.
John
Wednesday, November 24, 2004 9:13:04 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
John,

Great minds can't be bothered by silly little Johnny-come-lately issues like "correct spelling". :-)

Talk about giving undue importance to arbitrary values.

I have to say, that spell-checkers have improved my spelling quite a lot...especially the ones that you can set to give instant feed-back in the form of a "beep" or "ding" or (my personal favorite) "Thunk".

The value of Pavlovian conditioning is sometimes quite understated...but I DO wish I could get a piece of chocolate for every word I spell correctly. That would help a lot as well.

...mmmmmmmm...chocolate

Trees
kemaris
Wednesday, November 24, 2004 3:18:12 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Pointing out that someone has included typos in their email message (Which I am prone to do myself, and couldn't care less about) is tantamount to refrencing Hitler in an Internet argument. Unless the argument is actually about Hitler, making such an analogy means you loose (this is actually an "Internet Law", but I can't remember who's law it is right off hand). Likewise, trumping an opponents argument with 'but you spelled 'The' 'teh' means you loose as well. It means you know you can't refute the actual logical, reasonable or rational content of the argument, and thus are resorting to a form of ad hominem attack. Logically, this is a fallacy, and it means you loose. Unless, of course, it's an argument about spelling and grammer.

Spelling is important in novels, in spelling tests, in SAT and related tests, and things like that. Otherwise, a few typos here and there should just be ignored by those of us who have managed to evolve above the lizard-level of conciousness.
The Evil Cub
Comments are closed.
Search
Archive
Links
Categories
Admin Login
Sign In
Blogroll
Themes
Pick a theme: