Folding, spindeling, and mutilating lauguage for fun since Aug, 2004
Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Just saw X-Men 3 with Grasshopper, Adventure Boy, and Rocky.

 

God, Hugh Jackman is hot as Wolverine.  What’s up with that?  I don’t even care for Hugh Jackman that much, and that much hair isn’t normally my sort of thing.  Still…oh well.  What is, is.

 

But back to the story.

 

It was pretty good.  The theme was a visitation of an old theme:  The positive, active, creative dynamic light force of the Yang versus the dark, passive, negative, destructive, brooding force of the Yin.

 

The story illustrates that you cannot have good without bad, light without dark, and Superego without ID.

 

We see Jean Gray, the previously “sensitive” flat-line embodiment of benign non-personality, resurrected from the depths and transformed into Phoenix…the part of Jean Gray that wants…anything other than what Scott and Xavier want her to want.

 

The duality of Jean Gray goes all flippy-floppy and bad stuff ensues.  Oh, yeah, and along with getting in touch with her darkside, Jean also gets all touchy-feely with her full power.

 

I realize she’s evil now and all, but I have to admit, I like her better than I ever had before.  That, and the ending, are about the only points that truly meet between this movie, and what happened in the comic series.  They add a lot of stuff, subtract a lot of stuff, and stir it around with a liberal application of cool special effects, and that does manage to keep it fresh.

 

But when I talk about the Yin and Yang of goodness and badness, I am also talking about my reaction to them casting Kelsey Grammer as Dr. Hank McCoy.  I love Beast soooo much (Really, it isn’t the hair thing.  Lots of hair is a serious turn-off for me.  Honest)

 

He contends with Nightcrawler as my favorite X-man.  And yet I hate Kelsey Grammer.  I hated him as the fussy, whiney, blubbering Fraiser in Cheers, and as the fussy, whiney, blubbering Fraiser in … Fraiser (no, I wasn’t fooled into thinking he was less fussy, whiney and blubbering just because they gave him a brother who was more so.  Cheap trick…wouldn’t fall for it.)

 

I didn’t even like him as the fussy, whining blubbery Fraiser that he played in numerous commercials.

 

To be sure, he wasn’t Fraiser in this movie…(For one thing, Fraiser would have a mental melt-down being that blue and hairy)…but he wasn’t Beast either.

 

Yes, yes, he had the collegiate professor bit down, and yes, they made it clear he could kick ass (THANK YOU GOD for stunt doubles) and turn cars into ash trays with his bare hands…and hang from his prehensile toes…but what was missing was something that was so essentially BEAST and so essentially NOT KELSEY GRAMMER that I’m amazed it eluded the casting director.

 

Warmth.  Tenderness, Compassion, Depth.  OK, that’s four things and counting, as I intend to continue…

 

Yes, they implied his brilliance…but failed totally to convey even a glimmer of the sheer virtuosity of thought that makes Beast the character that he is.  The Classically trained mind, the devotion to Enlightenment Philosophy, the musical acumen.  Grrrr.

 

And what about his great, thick, black-rimmed glasses?  Nowhere to be seen.

 

I’m sure they could have found a half-dozen decent actors who could have done it.  Anthony Stewart Head comes to mind.

 

But once again, back to the story.

 

The ending was totally worth it…and no, I’m not going to spoil you.  It just was.  Hugh Jackman gets to be all intense and noble and suffering and ruthless and let rage war with love and grief through every fiber of his being.  Very comic book ending.

 

Have I mentioned that Hugh Jackman is really hot as Woverine?

 

Ian McClellan and Patrick Stewart are complete masters, as usual, and their presence in the film make it better than it really has a right to be.

 

I had fun watching this movie.  It wasn’t a work of art, but it clearly wasn’t meant to be.

Tuesday, May 30, 2006 5:34:54 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) | Comments [5] |  | #
Tuesday, May 30, 2006 11:06:34 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Hey, I like Kelsey Grammer, and I really enjoyed Fraiser. However, I must point out that Mr. Grammer's greatest role is clearly as Sideshow Bob. I haven't seen the movie yet, but I think you might have let your dislike of the actor influence your enjoyment of the role a bit. I know I do the same thing with every movie Tom Cruise is in...

Planning to see it today or tomorrow. Looks good to me from the ads.
The Evil Cub
Wednesday, May 31, 2006 1:05:30 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
We caught it on Monday afternoon and really enjoyed it. I like how the entire series has played on the theme of two paths to the same basic goal. Very well done.

I was a bit dissapointed with how Wolverine chose to resolve the final issue. I thought there was a more elegant and obvious approach. One that had already been used in fact. Ok, it wouldn't have had the same impact, but I'm trying to keep this comment spoiler free.

My biggest criticism is the two scenes that gave a glimpse of possible futures for some characters. I thought it lessened the impacts of the events that had gone on before. So my phantom edit would more completely wrap up a few of the dangling character loose ends.

Definately worth the cost of admission.
Wednesday, May 31, 2006 10:02:01 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
I'm with evil on this one. Tom Cruise can ruin it for me in a movie. But Kelsey? I thought he did well when you consider how the movie seemed to flit a bit... If I had any complaint it is that they had too much to fit in comfortably.

I too feel they could have ended slightly differently. That there was an obvious solution just lying there on the ground for Wolverine to pick up and use if only he had opened his eyes.

Did anyone else stick around for the after credits super-d-duper 28 days later ending?
iolar
Thursday, June 01, 2006 7:40:16 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Iolar!

Hey! You're here! You commented on my blog! WOW! I'm so glad to see you here!

Dude, that is so cool. As you can see, Dracut and the Marmot hang out here as well.

Hope you have a fantabulous motorcycle trip this weekend.
Kemaris
Monday, June 12, 2006 8:41:15 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Yeha, but like most things Iolar, I wander a bit... Saw Dracut's post in the STRIB... talk about an uberblog! IM'ed Marmot just this morning.

Yeah it was better than fantabulous. Except for one part it was tripendicular!
iolar
Comments are closed.
Search
Archive
Links
Categories
Admin Login
Sign In
Blogroll
Themes
Pick a theme: