Folding, spindeling, and mutilating lauguage for fun since Aug, 2004
Tuesday, 26 May 2009

Pcomeau put this video on my Facebook:



 It lead me to This Link.

Sometimes the stupid burns.  Sometimes the stupid clings and burns. Like Napalm. Von Mesis Institute: napalm for the brain.

And no, it's not an Onion article. They actually argue that a decentralized society ruled by a patchwork of autocratic theocrats and warlords who commit genital mutilation of little girls, honor killings against women, and allows famine, pandemic, mass killings, gun-point conversions, and a growing pirate trade is preferable to a stable centralized government that brings you fluoridated water, and a public health system.
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 22:46:43 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) | Comments [3] |  |  |  | #
Wednesday, 22 October 2008

Then again, sometimes the Ori are hilarious.

This website warns that Barak Obama's "tribe" in Kenya is working round the clock to cast witch spells to make McCain look like a doddering old coot, and calls on Christians to do constant spiritual warfare over McCain and Palin.


(Hat Tip:  Pharyngula)

Wednesday, 22 October 2008 13:17:02 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) | Comments [4] |  |  | #
Monday, 21 May 2007

This is so awesome!  It's so over the top, I'm leaning toward spoof.

(Hat Tip: Pharyngula)

Monday, 21 May 2007 20:10:42 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) | Comments [3] |  | #
Sunday, 25 March 2007

Page that made me wonder about spoof:

Thanks to "a small penguin" for sending it to me via e-mail

Sunday, 25 March 2007 22:00:14 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) | Comments [7] | #
Tuesday, 27 February 2007

OK, I'll admit, the title of this one might give it away for you English majors, or anyone who paid attention in High School English.

Still, pretty fun.

Tuesday, 27 February 2007 21:27:05 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) | Comments [0] | #
Friday, 23 February 2007


The "unbiased" conservative alternative to Wikipedia!  (unbiased AND conservative.  I wonder if they have an entry explaining the unbiased conservative definition of "oxymoron?")

And they are already bragging about how they have defeated immunizations.  Lovely.

God hates public health.  What next?  A Conservapedia entry about how they managed to sabotage drinking water floridation?

So, what do you all think?  Spoof, or No Spoof?

(I'm suspicious because of how closely they mimicked Wikipedia's "look" and format, plus, they seem to have pandered to exactly the most extreme Conservative stereotypes.  And the irony meter is even higher than usual what with the "unbiased conservative alternative" angle.  I mean really, announcing yourself to be "unbiased", while making your description of your bias the primary marketing focus ("conservative")of your whole site?  Really.  Just how dumb do they think we think they are?)


(via Pharyngula)

Friday, 23 February 2007 00:15:09 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) | Comments [5] |  | #
Friday, 19 January 2007

I've got a new Tag for y'all.

Spoof or no spoof...where I go out into the internet, and find the most outrageous website I can find, and we all vote on if it is a spoof or not a spoof.  It doesn't matter what the truth is, just what we decide.

Come on, it'll be fun.

So, our first candidate is this:

I got the link to this from Pharyngula.  So, whaddaya think?  Spoof, or No spoof?

Please explain your answer, and show your work.  OK, pick up your pencils, and begin.

Friday, 19 January 2007 23:14:15 (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) | Comments [6] | #
Admin Login
Sign In
Pick a theme: